First and foremost, my sincere apologies for not being able to update my blog as regularly as I wish due to reasons beyond my control. My last blog posting is dated October 8th 2008. It has been almost a month and a half since I’ve updated my blog. In that time, however, a lot has changed in the Malaysian sociopolitical scenario. Among the positives, RPK’s release from prison is by far the highlight of the month. Fuel prices have also come down to RM2.00. However, the negatives far outweigh the positives, as is always the case with Malaysia. This leads me to believe that not much has changed afterall, looking at the bigger picture. Najib will be unopposed in the upcoming UMNO elections and will eventually take over as the premier; at least he thinks so. The Home Minister, Syed Hamid Albar has been constantly shooting himself in the foot by making absolutely idiotic statements in the government controlled press. How this idiot got his law degree still baffles many a Malaysian. Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted of the Altantuya murder, as we all expected; while his fall guys, the two UTK officers have been left behind to face the music. Needless to say, no appeal has been made by the prosecution, in far contrast to the obsessive appealing made by the prosecution in the Anwar sodomy trial. Tun Dr Mahathir continues to make senile statements, no matter how irrelevant he may seem to be.

The one that takes the cake for me is the latest controversy regarding the regularly held PJ candlelight vigil in support of the dismantling of the Internal Security Act (ISA). The Malaysian police and Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) were quick to arrest the vigilers by force while they were singing the national anthem and had the cheek to deny doing so even with video evidence available. The reason given by the police was that no permit was given for the assembly (like permits were given to the numerous illegal protests held by Pemuda UMNO with now subdued Khairy Jamaluddin at the helm of things). Then again, the police force comes under the jurisdiction of the Home Ministry, need I say more?

This time around, the police has granted a permit for the PJ candlelight vigil but have imposed their 12 conditions, whereby if they’re not met, the permit applicant will be held responsible; in this case, Petaling Jaya city councillor Richard Yeoh. The 12 conditions are listed below:
• Organisers are responsible for the safety of the participants.
• Permission to use the venue is the responsibility of the organiser.
• Crowd must not spill onto the road and cause traffic obstruction.
• No form of political or racial speeches allowed.
• No use of fireworks or explosives, unless explicitly allowed by the police.
• No use of dangerous weapons.
• Organiser must ensure that there is no burning of candles to protest the ISA.
• Organiser must ensure that participants do not wear clothes which call for the abolishment of the ISA.
• Organiser must not hold any activities which show support for ISA detainees.
• Banners and fliers calling for the abolition of the ISA are forbidden.
• The police are free to make audio and video recordings of the event.
In my opinion, the police should have never drawn up certain conditions which are beyond their jurisdiction. For example, what the vigilers chose to wear and choose to say are none of their concern. This is indeed a gross violation of Article 10 of our Federal Constitution that guarantees freedom of speech. The police should only have imposed conditions to monitor the public’s general safety, traffic movements, etc. Who the hell do they think they are to tell us we can’t wear or say what we want? Do they forget or are they too stupid to realise that the taxpayers who pay them their undeserved salary and not their corrupt politicians are their masters? As human rights lawyer N. Surendran so rightly put it, handling a candle or wearing an anti-ISA shirt is not a security issue.

Now, when he was asked to comment, the issuer of the permit, Petaling Jaya police district deputy chief Mohd Shukor Sulong declined, saying that he wasn’t the right person to comment. Then why put your signature on the freaking permit, may I ask?? He went further to say that the right person to comment would be the Selangor police chief, Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar (pictured above), a proven liar I should add. He was the one who blatantly lied about the police NOT arresting the vigilers while the national anthem was being sung; and when faced with evidence proving otherwise, did not have the balls to retract his lie or apologise. What kind of comment do you think we could expect from this man of little or no integrity? Be prepared for a Syed Hamid Albarian comment, no doubt!
Comments & replies…
Posted in Politics with tags bloggers, BN, comment, freedom of speech, Malaysia, PR, reply on October 6, 2008 by jaredsdadQuite sometime ago, I wrote my last post on September 18th 2008 entitled Kickdefella Arrested for Sedition. I have been unusually busy of late attending to various matters pertaining to work and family, resulting in my lengthy absence from blogging. It caught me by surprise when I received an unexpected comment on that very article by a friend and former senior of mine from the Royal Military College by the name of Syahrizal S with regards to my resentment towards the BN government. In fact, he linked his comment on my post to a post of his own in his blog called the Drill & Grill. You can read the post on his blog here.
In his comment, Syahrizal maintained that race-based politics is also rampant in Pakatan Rakyat as opposed to Barisan Nasional. Furthermore, he implied that BN is not a “racist” party if their continued success in the history of Malaysian GEs is anything to go by. By his logic, if BN was a “racist” party and Malaysians have always voted for BN to be in power, that makes all Malaysians racists. Read his comment and my subsequent reply to his comment here.
I am not offended by his comment by any means. In fact, as I mentioned in my reply to his comment, I am honoured that he had made the time to comment on my supposedly “biased” article. In fact, it is exactly this kind of open discussion and objective and constructive criticism that we bloggers wish to indulge in at any given time. Ironically, this is also something that the current BN goverment does not condone wholeheartedly. They’re policies are far too evident with their constant chastising of bloggers who re perceived as “anti-BN”.
To Syahrizal and all other bloggers and visitors to my blog, I wish to say I may be wrong and that I will stand to be corrected. That is the whole point, we must not fail to see. Everyone should be open to comments and brickbats just the same. Most bloggers reserve the right to moderate the comments shown on their blogs. However, some bloggers fail to approve negative comments on their blogs and this should certainly not be the case. Take for instance, Tun Dr Mahathir’s blog. You will never find a comment made against his views. This is the case with many bloggers, sad to say. Forgive me for singling out Dr M but his blog comes to mind at this point of time.
For me, it is very simple. Live and let live. Blog and let blog. Just as is the case in most developed democracies, freedom of speech should be enshrined in our constitution. Malaysia should look towards the West and adopt this attitude. The attitude of the ruling government must change, for a better Malaysia. As for all the bloggers, we are set in our collective attitude. With the right amount of pressure and patience, we will realise this Malaysian dream. A Malaysia for all. A Malaysia for Bangsa Malaysia.
2 Comments »